Australia Gambling Reforms Stir Controversy Among Anti-Gambling Advocates

The Australian government has invited anti-gambling groups to a briefing on proposed Australia gambling reforms. However, the invitation comes with a controversial condition: attendees must sign a 12-page non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to participate in the discussion.

Australia Gambling Reforms Come with Strings Attached

Tim Costello, chief advocate for the Alliance for Gambling Reform, has refused to sign the NDA. He argued that signing such a document is impractical given that details of the proposed reforms have already been leaked to the press. Reports suggest that the Labor government is considering a partial ban on ads promoting real money gambling in Australia, restricting them during televised sports matches and capping the number of ads during general TV programming, rather than implementing the blanket ban recommended by a bipartisan parliamentary inquiry.

Transparency Concerns and Legal Challenges

Costello and other advocates are frustrated that anti-gambling groups are learning about potential reforms through media leaks rather than direct communication. Costello noted that he had never been asked to sign an NDA during his 30 years working in gambling reform.

Martin Thomas, the Alliance for Gambling Reform's chief executive, emphasized the difficulty of small organizations in securing timely legal advice on such agreements. He expressed concerns that if elements of the policy were made public, they might be prevented from speaking about them due to the NDA.

The government defended its approach, stating that it continues to engage with stakeholders regarding the recommendations from the online wagering inquiry as it formulates its response. However, the requirement for NDAs has not been well received by all invited groups, including Wesley Mission, who are still deliberating on whether to sign the agreement.

Public Health Experts Voice Concerns

Public health experts have also voiced their concerns. Professors Samantha Thomas from Deakin University and Mike Daube from Curtin University criticized the proposed reforms to the gambling regulations, arguing that they fall short of the comprehensive measures to protect the public from gambling harm. Thomas, who researches the impact of gambling advertising on children, expressed her refusal to sign an NDA, highlighting the difficulty in advocating for children if they are legally bound to confidentiality.

Backlash from Crossbenchers and Public Health Advocates

The government has also faced backlash from crossbenchers and public health advocates for consulting with betting, sports, and media companies before engaging with gambling harm advocates. Reports indicate that the government may propose a cap on television gambling ads instead of a total ban, a move that has angered the Greens and independent MPs who warn that anything less than a full ban could face significant opposition in the Senate.

The bipartisan committee chaired by the late Labor MP Peta Murphy recommended a phased approach to completely banning gambling ads over three years. Public health experts supported this recommendation, arguing that partial bans merely shift advertisements from one platform to another without addressing the core issue.

Influence of Australian Gambling Companies

Prof. Samantha Thomas criticized the influence of gambling companies, including leading Australian casinos, in shaping policy, suggesting that the proposed reforms are not based on public health evidence. Tim Costello echoed this sentiment, attributing the current situation to the power of the gambling lobby.

Independent MP Kate Chaney highlighted the disparity in consultations, noting that more attention seems to have been given to companies likely to lose out from a ban—such as Australian casinos—than to those suffering from gambling harm. Greens communications spokesperson Sarah Hanson-Young called for a complete ban, arguing that it is primarily the corporate giants in the gambling industry, including those running large casino operations, that support gambling adProf. Samantha Thomas criticized the influence of gambling companies in shaping policy, suggesting that the proposed reforms do not appear to be based on public health evidence. Tim Costello echoed this sentiment, attributing the current situation to the power of the gambling lobby.

Australia Gambling Reforms: Opposition's Criticism

As the government prepares to finalize its proposal, the opposition leader Peter Dutton has also criticized the process, pointing out the secrecy surrounding the consultations and the delays in policy formulation. Dutton emphasized the need for clear and decisive action on gambling ads to protect the community.

The debate over gambling advertisement reforms continues to intensify, with significant pressure on the government to align its policies with the recommendations of public health experts and community advocates. Whether the proposed measures will effectively address the issue remains to be seen.

Related Article: How NRL Gambling Ads Are Raising Concerns in Papua New Guinea